Removing neighbouring plants boosts growth of a Colorado Plateau grass
The story at a glance
In a 2019 experiment on the Colorado Plateau, researchers removed neighbouring plants around 18 James’ galleta grass plants. Where C3 grasses and forbs were removed, the focal plants had more soil water available than in control plots or plots where C4 grasses were removed. 12
The findings suggest that the loss of some neighbouring plants could release water for surviving galleta. But the experiment lasted one growing season at one site, and tested plant removal rather than climate change, so it cannot show whether future aridification will cause widespread or lasting shifts in grassland composition. 12
What you need to know
- Researchers used herbicide to remove C3 grasses and forbs, C4 grasses, or neither around 18 focal James’ galleta plants. Comparing these treatments allowed them to assess how neighbouring plant groups affected the focal grass. 12
- Soil moisture stayed above the study’s estimated stress threshold for an average of 54.3 days after C3 grasses and forbs were removed. The equivalent averages were 40.2 days in control plots and 40.3 days after C4 grasses were removed. 1
- At the end of the growing season, focal plant biomass was 21.2% higher in plots where C3 grasses and forbs had been removed than in control plots. This indicates a growth response under the experiment’s conditions, not a forecast of future plant abundance. 1
- The C4-grass removal treatment did not produce the same soil-moisture response as removal of C3 grasses and forbs. The results therefore point to differences between the neighbouring plant groups, rather than a general benefit from removing any competitor. 1
- Some measured differences in plant water stress were not statistically significant. The moisture and biomass results support a possible competitive-release mechanism, but the evidence does not establish all the ways water availability affected the focal plants. 1
Why this matters
Understanding how plant competition affects water availability can help explain possible vegetation responses as dryland conditions change. Related research also indicates that drought responses vary among species and conditions, so the result for James’ galleta should not be generalised to all grassland plants. 134
What happens next
The key questions are whether these effects persist across years, sites and precipitation patterns, and how losing C3 plants affects other species and ecosystem functions. Research across those conditions would be needed to assess whether competitive release contributes to lasting changes in grassland composition. 12
What we know
- The experiment took place in 2019 and centred on 18 focal James’ galleta plants on the Colorado Plateau. 12
- Removing C3 grasses and forbs increased soil moisture availability compared with the control and C4-grass removal treatments. 1
- Focal plant biomass was higher after C3 grasses and forbs were removed, while some water-stress differences were not statistically significant. 1
- The study tested neighbouring-plant removal over one growing season, rather than simulating climate change. 12
What we don't know
- It is not known whether the soil-water and growth effects persist over multiple years or occur at other sites and under different precipitation patterns. 12
- The experiment does not establish whether competitive release will result in a lasting or widespread shift towards C4 grasses under future aridification. 1
- The effects of C3 plant loss on other species, forage availability and ecosystem functions were not resolved by the reported experiment. 1
- It remains unclear which climate and site conditions would allow the observed release to change grassland composition over time. 134
Read the reporting
This WildNews briefing synthesises and summarises reporting from the sources below. WildNews did not produce the original reporting. Learn more about how we use AI
Was this story useful?
Your anonymous feedback helps us make future WildNews briefings more useful.
