CITES says evidence on Cambodia’s macaque-trade safeguards remains insufficient

The story in brief

What you need to know

• CITES identified evidence gaps concerning whether wild macaques are being used to restock breeding farms, and whether records can verify animals’ identities and origins. The assessment’s reported findings raise oversight concerns but do not establish that every farm or shipment involves illegally sourced animals.1
• Other reported concerns include export permits, the destruction of neck tags and farm stock reporting. These are parts of the system used to track macaques through breeding and export; CITES said the material provided did not establish that the recommended reforms had been fully implemented.1
• Cambodia reportedly expected to introduce microchipping by the end of 2026, but told CITES the change had been delayed until 2028. The available reporting does not say how the new timetable will be independently checked.1
• Earlier CITES documents also raised questions about reported breeding output, record-keeping and parentage checks, as well as differences between exporters’ and importers’ trade records. Those concerns are not, on their own, proof of illegal sourcing in any particular shipment.23
• A peer-reviewed study found discrepancies in macaque trade records for 2000–2020, including between permitted Cambodian exports and quantities reported by importers. Its data predate the reforms examined in the latest assessment and cannot show whether those reforms have worked.4

Conservation context

Why this matters

Reliable identification and breeding records are central to checking whether exported macaques came from captive breeding or were taken from the wild. The sources document unresolved verification concerns, but do not establish the current scale of wild capture or its conservation impact.123

The developing story

What happens next

The CITES Standing Committee is scheduled to meet from 2–6 November 2026, where further measures, including a possible trade suspension, may be considered. What evidence Cambodia will submit and how CITES will judge implementation remain open questions.1

Established evidence

What we know

• The latest assessment covered six recommendations issued to Cambodia in 2025 and found limited progress, according to Mongabay’s account.1
• CITES reported gaps in evidence on wild macaque restocking, animal identification, export records and farm stock reporting.1
• Earlier CITES documents recorded concerns about reported farm productivity, trade-record discrepancies and the need for stronger breeding records and parentage checks.23
• Cambodia’s agriculture ministry said it was cooperating with CITES and that unproven claims should not be treated as facts.1

Open questions

What we don't know

• The assessment did not confirm or rule out fraud or corruption in Cambodia’s macaque trade.1
• The available sources do not establish the actual origin of each animal or resolve the questions about reported breeding output.123
• The current extent of wild macaques taken to restock breeding facilities, and the conservation impact of any such capture, are not established in the reporting.1
• It remains unclear what evidence Cambodia will provide to demonstrate implementation of the recommendations, how CITES will assess it, and when microchipping will be introduced in practice.1

Source coverage

Read the reporting